Saturday, August 29, 2009

30 Reasons Creation is Wrong Part 2

Part 1 can be found here. And again the originial article can be found here

Ok so after that long interlude there let’s get into the actual article.

Evolutionists do not want us to teach in our public schools the science that shows the validity of creation. They want us to teach only their (with apologies to Rudyard Kipling) Just So Stories.


As with most “evolutionists” I wait with baited breath for someone to 1) Prove evolution wrong and 2) Prove without a shadow of a doubt that their creation view is right it is only when you do one of those two things that we will allow you to teach your “Just So Stories” in the classroom.

Personally, I believe that we should teach evolution side-by-side with creation giving equal scientific emphasis and have our students learn to think critically. Let us show them both and allow them to decide for themselves which one they will believe because origins is a faith position. Evolutionists reject this two model approach to teaching about origins because they inherently know that they will lose every time.


That sounds all good but again where is your evidence for creation? That is what it is going to take to get it in the classroom, if you can get out a peer reviewed article showing evidence for creation then I am all for allowing it to be taught in a classroom. What is scientific fact is not found out in a high school science classroom that is only where we teach the ideas that we have found to be true, it is found in a laboratory. But let’s play your game we should teach all the sides to an issue right? Well then we need to teach all the different Native American creation stories as well as the Hindu, Ancient Greek, Ancient Egyptian, and Norse. If someone has a creation story it needs to be taught so we are giving our students every side to the issue so they can make up their own minds.

If they will not allow the teaching in our public schools of the science to support creation and adamantly defend the teaching of evolution only, that is fine with me - as long as we teach the students more about evolution than the evolutionists do. If we teach students ALL about evolution then they will realize that evolution is intellectually bankrupt.


For the start of this paragraph see my above paragraph. You know you are right we don’t teach our high school students everything about evolution because it is a complex process. We teach them the basics because we could spend years teaching them all the details of evolution and they still wouldn’t know it all. This is obviously something this writer has not done, I say this not out of an insult to the writer but because by him saying that evolution is “intellectually bankrupt,” he is insulting all those who study the process, all those people who use evolution to create drugs and vaccines so that we may live better lives, and all those of us who are alive today thanks to the study of evolution. Again though if evolution is so “intellectually bankrupt” then why has no one published so in a peer reviewed journal?

The solution to evolution is education!


Hmm interesting this why is it true that the more education you get the more you “believe” in evolution? Source (http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=1550)

Please allow us to teach the students the truth about the implications of the Laws of Science, such as the First and Second Law of Thermodynamics, and how these Laws disprove evolution. Please allow us to teach the truth about the whole and complete nature of natural processes, like photosynthesis and metamorphosis, and how these could not possible come into existence by random chance. Please allow us to teach the truth about what is really in the ground, like the out of order layers and polystrate fossils, as opposed to what evolutionists say is in the ground.


How the first two deal with evolution has always gotten me. Now I know we will cover most of these later on so I don’t want to cover them here it is just a waste of time.

Please allow us to teach the truth about the hoaxes and frauds that have been authenticated and perpetuated by evolutionists then later had to be retracted. Please allow us to teach the truth about: Piltdown Man, Java Man, Peking Man, English Peppered Moths, the Horse Series, Pithecanthropus alalus, Galapagos Finch Beaks, embryonic recapitulation and the Monera.


Although most of these aren’t completely hoaxes or frauds, especially the “horse series” and the “Galapagos Finch Beaks”, those that are truly hoaxes and frauds were discovered to be so by Scientists. This is the way science works when someone publishes something that isn’t true or doesn’t really work other scientists while trying to replicate his results find it impossible and call him on it viola science!

Please allow us to teach the students the truth about how the acceptance of evolution is the foundational justification to promote: human racism, homosexuality, abortion, euthanasia, lawlessness, pornography, and all the other immoral and unethical activities within our society.


Really wow I didn’t know that. I guess germ and cell theory have the same goal in mind? The purpose of evolution is to explain how the life on this earth came to be how it is today. As I have stated in my blog previously science is by its very definition agnostic and on the same note it is also apolitical. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and I wait patiently for you to present me with the evidence for this.

Yes, I am convinced! We need to teach more about evolution is our public schools, not less!


As am I although I also feel that we need to teach more math, English, other foreign languages, social studies/history, and other sciences.

With this admonition in mind, I want to give you a Primer on the Scientific Reasons that Evolution is Wrong. The following are only thirty basic points and are by no means the total list that we might make. This is just a list that you may refer to when you want a quick way to look up what is wrong with evolution.


And I intend on showing you how all 30 are wrong so that creationists cannot ever use these arguments again!

In part 3 we will get to the list, I promise!!

No comments:

Post a Comment